Conceptual impressions surrounding this post are yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness an conciousness.
Emergence describes a field in patterned oscillation, a repetitive and adaptive phenomenon driven by potentialities hidden within the interaction and synchronization of internal and external elements. Together these actions contribute to the concept of a field’s “substance”. A field acts as an insulator and barrier from the context in which it appears to emerge. An emergent field appears cell-like in response to the time, space and the contextual environment in which it is both attracted and repulsed.
Consciousness represents the context, i.e. the unknown, in which awareness, i.e. the known, can be made cognizant by means of design. Consciousness is an emergent field composed of an array of virtual energy positions observed from perspectives both within and beyond the field’s central focus, i.e. zero point. Full consciousness represents
a treasury of ideas that surround a single concept, a convoluted and
illusionary product of the imagination that when connected reflect upon a
common “source”.
Consciousness is Infinite. Consciousness is made conscionable
by means of a series of patterns of virtual energy brought to awareness by means of a series of symbolic portals (experiences) and synchronistic events.
Every point of awareness,
i.e. event, has a tensor position located within a field we interpret being
“experience”. Every experience aligns with a set of values symbolizing the “quality”
of the event being observed. Every event eventually curves back upon itself in
a geodesic like path. Every event is part and parcel of an experience with its
own set values characterizing the field in which it is observed.
Consciousness is made
self-apparent by means of the causal links, i.e. the designs, symbolically
linking events, i.e. points of awareness. In other words, the symbolic field we
describe as consciousness is an emergent field, a field that surfaces as the
result of the collaboration of a multitude of symbolic event/experiences.
Consciousness can therefore
be viewed as an experience having emerged as the result of a series of events
symbolically linked from within the confines of a virtual field interpreted as light,
energy and/or information. A synchronistic
event can trigger, accelerate and often magnify these same relationships.
Every synchronistic event gives a certain “structure” to every experience. The most basic could be considered the most sentient and physical in nature. In this example, the “experience” is perceived as a series of events that have been haphazardly linking together by chance.
A more holistic
interpretation would include both a mental and emotional (Kama/Manas)
interpretation of an event. More refined levels of emergence reveal a more holistic
perception of the events and experiences that together symbolically contribute
to one’s own interpretation of consciousness.
Every synchronistic event contains the potential for traveling beyond the confines of its current field of awareness. Each event/experience represents, describes and defines, by means of its independence, a certain template that, by way of a series of synchronistic events, can also create a portal into yet another field, i.e. dimension, of consciousness.
A synchronistic event is a causal agent, a symbolic
catalyst designed to initiate, create and establish a gateway between emerging
levels of awareness.
Each event/experiences has
its own “local” coordinate system. (See "Gaia is an Emerging Field”) Each
event/experience defines and describes itself in its own way. Each event/experience
is poised and curved within the framework of a greater field of consciousness
in which it participates. Each curvature describes the dynamic evolution of a
field at-large being virtually separated from its original source, i.e. zero
point, while responding within the context of its current position in
timelessness*. Evolution emerges from out of time and into space in a
non-linear fashion by means of events and experiences that appear within the
constraints of an emerging field of light, energy and information we perceive
as consciousness.
* A synchronistic event
occurs in the now (present) and is viewed from a perspective that trumps linear time. A synchronistic event is an invitation into another
realm, another dimension and another reality.
* * *
Synchrony, Structure, and Expansion of Consciousness
From a metaphysical perspective, reality may be understood not as a static assemblage of objects, but as a living field of relations in which meaning, structure, and awareness co-emerge. Within this field, synchronistic events, universal or systemic rules, symbolic resonance, and emergent consciousness are not independent phenomena; rather, they are distinct expressions of a single underlying process by which order and novelty continuously arise together.
Synchronistic events, as articulated by Carl Jung, represent meaningful coincidences that are not reducible to linear causality but are bound instead by shared significance (Jung, 1952/1969). Metaphysically, synchronicity signals moments when the internal symbolic configuration of consciousness aligns with the external configuration of events. Such moments do not violate systemic or universal rules; instead, they reveal those rules operating at a deeper, acausal level where meaning, rather than force, becomes the primary connective principle. Synchrony thus functions as a disclosure mechanism, exposing latent structures within the field of reality that ordinarily remain implicit.
These latent structures are what metaphysics often describes as systemic or universal rules. They are not rigid laws imposed upon reality from without, but generative constraints that shape how emergence can occur. In this sense, universal rules resemble what David Bohm described as the “implicate order,” a deeper, enfolded structure from which explicate phenomena unfold (Bohm, 1980). Such rules maintain coherence across scales—quantum, biological, psychological, and cultural—by preserving relational patterns even as surface forms change. They provide continuity without predetermining outcomes, allowing emergence to remain both lawful and creative.
Symbolic resonance is the mediating process that allows synchronistic events and systemic rules to be apprehended by consciousness. Symbols operate as carriers of compressed meaning, capable of linking subjective experience with objective patterns. When a symbol resonates, it activates a correspondence between inner states and outer structures, enabling consciousness to recognize itself within the larger field. As Jung observed, symbols are not mere signs but living forms that participate in the realities they signify (Jung, 1964). Metaphysically, symbolic resonance is how the emergent field “communicates with itself,” translating structural relations into experiential meaning.
Through repeated cycles of synchrony and symbolic resonance, consciousness expands. This expansion, however, does not dissolve structure; rather, it reorganizes it. Emergent consciousness grows by integrating new contexts while preserving the integrity of prior patterns, much like a fractal that elaborates itself without abandoning its governing geometry. Ilya Prigogine demonstrated that complex systems maintain identity not by resisting change, but by metabolizing it through self-organization (Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). Metaphysically, consciousness behaves as a dissipative structure: it sustains itself by continuously transforming informational, symbolic, and experiential flows.
Contextual change is therefore initiated not through rupture, but through resonance. A synchronistic event introduces a perturbation rich in meaning; symbolic resonance amplifies and interprets that meaning; systemic rules constrain the range of viable integrations; and emergent consciousness incorporates the new configuration into a broader field of awareness. At each stage, structure is not lost but transposed into a higher-order coherence. Gregory Bateson described this process as “the pattern which connects,” emphasizing that evolution—biological or cognitive—proceeds through recursive refinement of relational order rather than linear accumulation (Bateson, 1972).
In this way, a perpetually expanding emergent consciousness can be understood as a self-referential field: it generates symbols, encounters synchrony, recognizes systemic order, and, through that recognition, becomes capable of perceiving ever more inclusive contexts. The field remains stable because its governing patterns persist, yet it remains dynamic because those patterns are endlessly re-expressed. Metaphysically, this is the paradox of emergence: change is continuous, but coherence endures. Consciousness expands not by escaping structure, but by learning to inhabit structure more deeply, revealing the universe itself as a meaningful, evolving design.
References (APA)
- Bateson, G. (1972). Steps to an ecology of mind. University of Chicago Press.
- Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the implicate order. Routledge.
- Jung, C. G. (1964). Man and his symbols. Doubleday.
- Jung, C. G. (1969). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle (R. F. C. Hull, Trans.). Princeton University Press. (Original work published 1952)
- Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books
The author generated some of this text in part with ChatGPT 5.2 OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
- Is Reality Real? These neuroscientists don't think so / Big Think
* * *
"Science’s
self-assumed responsibility has been self-limited to disclosure to society only
of the separate, supposedly physical (because separately weighable) atomic
component isolations data. Synergetic integrity would require the scientists to
announce that in reality what had been identified heretofore as physical is
entirely metaphysical — because synergetically weightless. Metaphysical has
been science’s designation for all weightless phenomena such as thought. But
science has made no experimental finding of any phenomena that can be described
as a solid, or as continuous, or as a straight surface plane, or as a straight
line, or as infinite anything. We are now synergetically forced to conclude
that all phenomena are metaphysical; wherefore, as many have long suspected —
like it or not — life is but a dream."
* * *
* * *
* * *
"To believe is to accept another's truth.
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
Edited: 08.10.2013, 10.17.2014, 11.08.2014, 05.05.2015, 01.10.2017, 12.19.2017, 02.17.2018, 09.22.2019, 02.21.2020, 06.09.2022, 09.04.2022, 03.30.2023, 05.07.2023, 11.16.2024, 11.28.2024, 01.21.2026
Find your truth. Know your mind.
Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral
part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and
URL https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/ is
included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please
note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2023 C.G.
Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice). You are also invited to visit https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/
No comments:
Post a Comment