Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awarenes and consciousness.
Consciousness is the product of a series of synchronistic events based
upon the concept of emergence. Complex systems appear to emerge out of
nowhere, are in perpetual motion, characteristically adapt to every situation
and at times, appear to be hidden. Each system possesses a “quality” of its own,
which in turn gives expression to a certain intelligence/consciousness that
appears veiled and beyond the awareness of each contributing element … whether
sentient or not.
Over time directions change
as elements are attracted and repulsed by vectors (projections/forces) both
within and beyond the parametric nuclei of every field of energy, light and
information. Elements become focused by certain systemic/universal rules of attraction,
repulsion and distribution.
A CASE OF SYMBOLIC RESONANCE
We live in a vibratory universe. Emergent fields like consciousness retain the potential of becoming self-correcting and self-organizing, along with expressing a certain degree of “intelligence” by means of cyclically
experiencing a series of synchronistic events that optimize the distribution of energy, light and information
beyond any blueprint.
1.,2.3.
Randomly wandering projections create the paths in which future pioneering generations migrate, develop and evolve in order to optimize the distribution of energy in motion (e-motion). Greater complexity, randomness, divergence, and deviation generate a greater consciousness.
A more embracing use
of symbolism, i.e. design, is key in optimizing the emergence of a greater imagination, the product of which is the emergence of a greater consciousness. The optimal source is everywhere and nowhere.
The zero point is an
imaginary unit used solely for the purpose of creating a reference point in
describing what is actually an endlessly emerging field of energy, light and
information. What is key are the intimate relationships created between neighboring elements that contribute, harbor and spread the relative light, energy and in-form-ation necessary to the
survival of the field.
1. ^ a b Fries P (2001). "A mechanism for cognitive dynamics: neuronal communication through neuronal coherence". TICS 9: 474–480.
2. ^ Fell J, Axmacher N (2011). "The role of phase synchronization in memory processes". Nat Rev Neurosci 12: 105–118.
3. ^ a b Schnitzler A, Gross J (2005). "Normal and pathological oscillatory communication in the brain". Nat Rev Neurosci 6 (4): 285–296. doi:10.1038/nrn1650. PMID 15803160
* * *
Synchronistic events, systemic or universal rules, symbolic resonance, and emergence can be understood as interlocking dimensions of a single metaphysical process through which reality continuously organizes and reorganizes itself. When viewed through the lens of design consciousness, these elements do not function as isolated phenomena; rather, they operate as mutually reinforcing layers of meaning, causation, and structure. Together they explain how contextual change occurs without dissolving the coherence of the field in which change unfolds.
Synchronistic events are often experienced as meaningful coincidences—occurrences that appear to be causally unrelated yet are perceived as symbolically connected. Carl Jung described synchronicity as an “acausal connecting principle,” suggesting that events can be linked not by physical causation but by shared meaning (Jung, 1960). From a metaphysical standpoint, synchronicity signals that the universe operates not only through linear cause-and-effect chains but also through deeper patterns of relational significance. These patterns reveal that meaning itself may act as an organizing force in the unfolding of events. In this sense, synchronistic occurrences serve as indicators of a hidden order operating beneath the surface of observable phenomena.
This hidden order is what can be called systemic or universal rules—the governing principles that shape how energy, information, and form interact across different levels of reality. Philosophers of process such as Alfred North Whitehead proposed that the universe is best understood as a network of interrelated events rather than as a collection of static objects (Whitehead, 1929). Within such a process-oriented ontology, rules do not function as external impositions but as intrinsic tendencies of the system toward coherence, stability, and transformation. These universal rules provide the structural grammar within which synchronicities can occur. Without an underlying order, meaningful coincidence would be impossible; there would be no consistent field capable of generating recognizable patterns.
Symbolic resonance forms the bridge between these two domains. Symbols are not merely human constructs; they are condensations of experiential and archetypal meaning that participate in the structure of consciousness itself. Jung argued that archetypal symbols arise from the collective unconscious and organize perception and behavior according to deep psychological patterns (Jung, 1968). When an individual encounters a synchronistic event, it often resonates with an internal symbolic framework that renders the event meaningful. Symbolic resonance therefore acts as a tuning mechanism between inner consciousness and outer circumstance. It allows universal rules to be experienced personally and contextually, translating impersonal structures into lived significance.
Emergence arises from the dynamic interplay of these forces. In systems theory, emergence refers to the process by which complex patterns arise from the interaction of simpler components (Holland, 1998). An emergent field is not imposed from above; it develops organically as relationships between elements stabilize into higher-order configurations. Synchronistic events can be understood as momentary flashes of emergence—instances in which disparate elements suddenly align to reveal a new level of coherence. Symbolic resonance enables this alignment by providing a shared language of meaning, while systemic rules ensure that the alignment is not random but structurally consistent.
The crucial metaphysical question is how these elements can initiate contextual change while maintaining their own structure. The answer lies in the self-organizing nature of emergent systems. Ilya Prigogine’s work on dissipative structures demonstrated that systems far from equilibrium can generate new forms of order through fluctuations and feedback loops (Prigogine & Stengers, 1984). Change, in this model, does not destroy structure; it reorganizes it at a higher level. Synchronistic events function as catalytic fluctuations within the field of experience. They introduce novelty and redirect attention, prompting shifts in perception, behavior, or understanding. Yet the universal rules that allowed the synchronicity to occur remain intact, just as the grammar of a language persists even as new sentences are formed.
Symbolic resonance likewise both transforms and preserves. When a symbol acquires new contextual relevance, it may alter an individual’s worldview or a culture’s trajectory. However, the archetypal structure of the symbol endures, ready to be reinterpreted in future circumstances. This dual movement ... change at the surface, stability at the depth ... is characteristic of emergent fields. As complexity theorist Stuart Kauffman noted, living systems exist at the “edge of chaos,” a zone where enough order exists to maintain identity, yet enough flexibility remains to allow creative adaptation (Kauffman, 1995).
Thus, contextual change emerges through a continual dialogue between order and novelty. Synchronistic events introduce meaningful disruptions; systemic rules provide continuity; symbolic resonance mediates between subjective experience and objective structure; and emergence weaves these threads into new patterns of organization. The emergent field maintains its identity not by resisting change but by metabolizing it ... by integrating new information into an ever-evolving framework of relations.
From a design consciousness perspective, reality can be envisioned as a living architecture of meaning. Every synchronistic moment is a point of potential redesign, every symbol a tool for reconfiguration, every universal rule a stabilizing constraint, and every act of emergence a creative synthesis. Change does not occur outside the system but through it, as an intrinsic expression of its deeper logic. In this way the universe remains simultaneously structured, coherent, inventive, stable and perpetually new.
References
- Holland, J. H. (1998). Emergence: From chaos to order. Oxford University Press.
- Jung, C. G. (1960). Synchronicity: An acausal connecting principle. Princeton University Press.
- Jung, C. G. (1968). The archetypes and the collective unconscious (2nd ed.). Princeton University Press.
- Kauffman, S. A. (1995). At home in the universe: The search for laws of self-organization and complexity. Oxford University Press.
- Prigogine, I., & Stengers, I. (1984). Order out of chaos: Man’s new dialogue with nature. Bantam Books.
- Whitehead, A. N. (1929). Process and reality. Macmillan
The author generated some of this text in part with ChatGPT 5.2 OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
* * *
Design is change.
Bridging the gap between omniscience
and mortal awareness.
Edited: 07.08.2013, 08.08.2013, 10.17.204, 11.08.2014, 01.11.2017, 07.18.2020, 08.13.2022, 01.20.2026, 01.29.2026
Find your truth. Know your mind.
Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral
part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and
URL http://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ is
included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please
note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2017 C.G.
Garant. All Rights Reserved. Fair Use Notice.
No comments:
Post a Comment