Design in the New Age III

Conceptual impressions surrounding this post are yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network. Objective: To generate symbolic links between scientific discovery, design awareness and consciousness.

ALLOW MEANING AND PURPOSE TO FOCUS WITHIN THE MOMENT. ALL FORMS OF ENERGY OPERATE WITHIN THE PARAMETERS OF A COMMON FIELD.

THE IMAGINATION GIVES FORM LIFE. 

MEANING IS VALUE ADDED.

PURPOSE CHANGES MEANING CHOOSES.

DESIGN BRINGS MEANING AND PURPOSE TO CONSCIOUSNESS.

PROBABILITY LIES DORMANT WITHIN A VIRTUAL FIELD OF POTENTIAL. 

EXPERIENCE IS WHAT IS BELIEVED AND RARELY WHAT IS UNDERSTOOD.

MEANING AND PURPOSE CREATE A DESIGN MATRIX OF THOUGHT AND DESIRE.

TIME IS WOVEN AND SUBSTANTIATED IN EVERY EVENT AND EXPERIENCE. TIMELESSNESS NEEDS NO SUBSTANTIATION. 

DESIGN IS A CREATIVE AND COLLECTIVE ENTERPRISE  MADE IDENTIFIABLE THROUGH SYMBOLIC MEANS. DESIGN DESCRIBES EXPERIENCE AS A SERIES OF SYMBOLIC EVENTS MADE APPARENT WHEN OBSERVED WITHIN THE CONTEXT OF TIME AND SPACE.

DESIGN MAGNETIZES TIME AND SPACE INTO PATTERNS OF ENERGY, LIGHT AND INFORMATION. TOGETHER THEY CAN IDENTIFY THE SOURCE IN THE FORM OF A SYMBOLIC EVENT AND/OR EXPERIENCE.

RETROFITTING PAST ERRORS BECOME MEANINGFUL WHEN PURPOSELY BROUGHT INTO BALANCE BY DESIGN.

DESIGN IS ATTRACTED TO THE VIRTUAL REALMS OF ENERGY, LIGHT AND INFORMATION. 

TIME CAN BE CATEGORICAL AND DESIGNED APPROPRIATELY.

TIME IS OPTIONAL AND A MATTER OF CHOICE. 

TIME REFLECTS UPON AN OBSERVER. SPACE DEMANDS GREATER INVOLVEMENT WITH TIME.

TIME CHANGES IN EVERY MOMENT. CHANGE IS THE CONTEXT. TIME MERELY FRAMES THE OBSERVER.

DESIGN DETERMINES HOW ITS' AGENCY IS REPRESENTED BY VIRTUE ITS OWN AWARENESS. 

DESIGN AND CONSCIOUSNESS TRANSCEND EACH OTHER.

DIFFERENTIATION IS BROUGHT TO LIGHT BY VIRTUE OF ITS WHOLENESS. WHOLENESS IS BROUGHT TO LIGHT BY VIRTUE OF ITS DIFFERENCES.

DESIGN CREATES THE SYMBOLIC PORTALS BETWEEN THE PAST, THE PRESENT AND THE FUTURE. ITS AS IF TIME IS NON-EXISTENT.

* * *

This passage is a rich philosophical text exploring design, time, consciousness, and meaning through metaphysical and semiotic lenses. Below is a refined and academically expanded version of this material. The revision maintains your poetic tone while situating key ideas within scholarly frameworks from psychology, quantum physics, semiotics, metaphysics, aesthetics, and sociology, with appropriate citations. 

Toward a Metaphysics of Design, Time, and Meaning: An Interdisciplinary Reflection 

Design emerges as a conscious force that draws meaning and purpose into coherence within the lived moment. It operates as both agent and symbol—a structured interplay between imagination and matter—engaging with what physicists refer to as the virtual field of potential (Bohm, 1980; Heisenberg, 1958). All forms of energy, in this view, act within the parameters of a unified field, suggesting a non-dual ontology wherein consciousness is inseparable from the patterns it observes and enacts. 

The imagination does not merely represent, but actively gives life form, becoming an epistemic and aesthetic operator in the co-creation of experience (Hillman, 1975). Meaning, as the text implies, is not inherent but value-added—constructed through relational and interpretive acts (Barthes, 1972; Eco, 1976). This aligns with a semiotic understanding of signification, where meaning is always contextual, contingent, and mediated through culturally embedded codes. 

Purpose, in contrast, is a volitional act, shaping trajectories through selective engagement with meaning. Thus, “purpose changes; meaning chooses” suggests a dynamic, bidirectional relationship where intention can alter perception and vice versa. Together, meaning and purpose form a design matrix—a conceptual architecture through which thought and desire are structured, projected, and recursively interpreted (Lakoff & Johnson, 1980). 

In quantum terms, probability lies dormant within a super positional state, awaiting observation to actualize specific outcomes (Bohr, 1935). The observer thus becomes a constitutive agent—not merely in physics, but in the construction of experience, which, as noted, is often “what is believed and rarely what is understood.” This echoes phenomenological concerns with the gap between perception and understanding (Merleau-Ponty, 1945). 

Time is portrayed here not as a linear flow but as a woven and symbolic medium—substantial within experience but optional in its metaphysical essence. The suggestion that “timelessness needs no substantiation” points toward a non-temporal ontology, resonating with Eastern philosophies and contemporary physics' discussions on block time and timelessness (Rovelli, 2018). Design, in this context, does not merely exist in time but magnetizes time and space into patterns of energy, light, and information—creating symbolic portals across temporal dimensions (Jantsch, 1980; Barad, 2007). 

Moreover, the recursive nature of meaning is evident in the assertion that retrofitting past errors becomes meaningful only when purpose is restored through balance by design. This reflects both psychoanalytic integration (Jung, 1964) and sociological reconciliation—where healing and coherence emerge through narrative reconfiguration (Ricoeur, 1984). 

Design is thus attracted to the virtual, acting as a bridge between potential and actual, between symbol and experience. It frames time categorically, but also reveals time to be optional, malleable, and contingent upon the level of conscious participation by the observer. As the text posits, “time changes in every moment. Change is the context. Time merely frames the observer.” This framing underscores time not as an external constant but as a perceptual and symbolic construct, aligning with relativity theory and phenomenological thought alike. 

Finally, the claim that design and consciousness transcend each other positions both as co-emergent and mutually defining—two aspects of the same ontological field. Differentiation is understood as emergent from wholeness, and wholeness, in turn, is only perceptible through its differentiated expressions. This paradox evokes the dialectics of unity and multiplicity, foundational in both Hegelian and Taoist thought. 

In conclusion, the text suggests that design is the symbolic architecture of time, meaning, and consciousness, creating portals through which the past, present, and future become visible, not as linear events but as dynamic and interrelated symbolic expressions. In this sense, time may not exist in any fundamental way, except as a framing device for the conscious mind—a semiotic scaffold upon which the architecture of experience is drawn. 

References 

• Ahmed, S. (2004). The Cultural Politics of Emotion. Routledge. 

• Barad, K. (2007). Meeting the Universe Halfway: Quantum Physics and the Entanglement of Matter and Meaning. Duke University Press. 

• Barthes, R. (1972). Mythologies. Hill and Wang. 

• Bohm, D. (1980). Wholeness and the Implicate Order. Routledge. 

• Bourdieu, P. (1977). Outline of a Theory of Practice. Cambridge University Press. 

• Damasio, A. (1994). Descartes’ Error: Emotion, Reason, and the Human Brain. Putnam. 

• Eco, U. (1976). A Theory of Semiotics. Indiana University Press. 

• Freud, S. (1923). The Ego and the Id. 

• Heisenberg, W. (1958). Physics and Philosophy: The Revolution in Modern Science. Harper. 

• Heidegger, M. (1927). Being and Time. 

• Hillman, J. (1975). Re-Visioning Psychology. Harper & Row. 

• Husserl, E. (1913). Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology. 

• Jantsch, E. (1980). The Self-Organizing Universe. Pergamon. 

• Jung, C.G. (1964). Man and His Symbols. 

• Kant, I. (1790). Critique of Judgment. 

• Lakoff, G., & Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors We Live By. University of Chicago Press. 

• Merleau-Ponty, M. (1945). Phenomenology of Perception. 

• Peirce, C. S. (1931–1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. 

• Ricoeur, P. (1984). Time and Narrative. 

• Rovelli, C. (2018). The Order of Time. Riverhead Books. 

• Whitehead, A.N. (1929). Process and Reality. 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth.

To know is your own creation."

Anonymous

Edited: 01.11.2017, 01.30.2017, 03.05.2018, 11.18.2018, 12.25.2018, 10.26.2019, 03.26.2020, 09.20.2020, 01.14.2021, 07.14.2025

Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and URL https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ is included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2023 C.G. Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice.) 

 You are also invited to visit https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/ and https://sagariandesignnetwork.blogspot.com.