December 20, 2013

The Omega Point: A Brief Commentary


Conceptual impressions surrounding this post are yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network.

It soon becomes apparent that the concept of the Omega Point is a reflection of Teilhard de Chardin’s view of the events and experiences of his life from the position of a Jesuit priest, paleontologist and geologist. His attempt to reconcile his religious beliefs with that of science is a noble one, while his arguments concerning the concept of the Omega Point remain within the parameters of a cherished theology.

Teilhard appears to have been conflicted between his deep-seated faith and his objective rational mind, a circumstance that requires a high degree of compromise between facts, observation, awareness and dogma. The teachings of the faith have been brought into conflict with the observations surrounding his scientific studies. This has created a series of arguments that long for recognition within the ideological demands of both camps. I believe his attempt to rationalize the concepts of evolution, the universe, God, etc. by means of mixing and matching the symbols and metaphors that correspond to science and religion have led his argument into a multitude of compromising situations.

Concerning the Law of Complexity/Consciousness: 
In my opinion the universe is both evolving and involving in a perpetual flux, an unpredictable unified field drawn into a wide variety of "states" of form and consciousness due to alterations and modifications caused by internal and contextual influences.

I believe that the concept of an Omega Point is position-less, a virtual and omnipresent origin that shelters a paradoxical “state” of awareness both within and beyond its own parameters. The concept surrounding an Omega Point involves an Intelligence, a holistic, complex and self-organizing system of agencies, i.e. a unified field that by means of its symbolic emergence creates, defines and brings into fruition the "ideas" we experience as consciousness. In this sense the concept of the Omega Point symbolizes a highly complex source that harbors the capacity to transcend and transform itself by means of agents that symbolically provide relative form and being-ness (awareness). The Omega Point is comparable to the Zero Point (Unit) which is given symbolic expression by means of a Unified field (Unity) we experience as consciousness. 

The concept of a single Omega Point cannot exist independent or separate from itself, but must be construed as part of a complex and fully integrated network symbolizing both the known and unknown. In essence, the Omega Point is symbolically present in every "form" in and of the universe. Humanity describes this infinite singularity of presence as the universe.

The universe is supremely complex, self-organizing and beyond the capacity of humanity to imagine. What we cannot imagine fits under the category of the unknown. Every state that substantiates the universe retains the potential of being altered into another frame of reference, i.e. state, by means of a single or series of events, e.g. evolution and the archetypes, initiated by alterations in frequency, substance and/or context.

August 24, 2016 at 7:38 am, Peter B. Todd said:
"Jung and Teilhard de Chardin developed an evolving and mystical, Incarnational theology culminating in a Christ omega point or divine focus of mind. God is immanent in nature and transcending of it so that the universe and the divine are not ontologically equivalent and mind is as much a fundamental feature of Reality as is matter itself. In Teilhard’s thought, consciousness is the mirror, which the universe has evolved to reflect upon itself and in which its very existence is revealed in mathematical laws and in the internal world of the psyche. In a dual-aspect monist epistemology, mind and matter are complementary manifestations of an underlying holistic order, which is metaphysical in nature and expressions of a numinous principle implicit in cosmology and evolution. The Jung/ Pauli archetypes as cosmic ordering and regulating principles are analogous to the implicate order of physicist David Bohm and his colleagues Pavvo Pylkkänen and Basil Hiley. Both positions imply the demise of dogmatic physicalism (materialism) which has dominated Western science as an ideology masquerading as science for 400 years so that consciousness has causal efficacy in cultural evolution and in the re-sacralisation of global consciousness."
Being human is but one state of universal consciousness that from a theological point of view, has been "made in the image of God". This is but one POV designed about the subjective and collective experiences and events affecting the imagination of the species as a whole. Discussions and arguments concerning the mind cannot escape the fact that the "mind" is a concept harboring the idea of an imagination, i.e. the mind is a reflection of itself being symbolized by the very POV taken to describe and/or define it.  

According to Teilhard the Omega Point exists outside the framework of the universe, is irreversible, beyond the limitations of time and space and takes the position of the Christ, i.e. Light, to which everything in the universe is attracted. According to this POV the Omega Point remains an extension of Teilhard’s theology attempting to re-present itself in a more scientific fashion.





Edited: 12.21.2013, 12.22.2013, 03.05.2014, 10.15.2014, 10.17.2014, 10.18.2014, 11.19.2014, 02.19.2015, 12.18.2016, 01.10.2017, 10.09.2018, 07.07.2020, 04.29.2021, 12.15.2021
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and URL https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ is included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2023 C.G. Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice.) AI usage is prohibited. You are also invited to visit https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/ 



December 18, 2013

The Design Paradigm: Intuition, Intelligence and the Imagination


Conceptual impressions surrounding this post are yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network.

The intuition participates in the concepts of intelligence, knowledge, emotion and imagination. The intuition is universally shared and has often been described as an aspect of the mind when presented before consciousness. This simple awareness is made apparent through events and experiences by virtue of design. Design affords the veil that cloaks the imagination by symbolically and metaphorically melding the physical with the metaphysical, the known with the unknown, the parts with the whole and reality with illusion. 

Design is concentrated within the subconscious, a membranaceous layer between the seen and the unseen, the consciousness and the un-conscious. Knowledge emerges as result of this illusionary and imaginary matrix. Only by design can any concept existing outside appearances, i.e. awareness/consciousness, begin to be approached. Knowledge stems from correspondences made between the intellect and the emotions, i.e. the intuition, by virtue of the imagination. The intuition brings into balance the forces of emotion and intelligence by means of inscribing them into a symbolic and metaphorical language. Together they give precedence to what might be described as the mind.


mīnd/ 
noun the element of a person that enables them to be aware of the world and their experiences, to think and to feel; the faculty of consciousness and thought.
"as the thoughts ran through his mind, he came to a conclusion"

I   It is within the realm of virtual awareness, i.e. the metaphysical, that the unknown lies hidden within the context and framework of its own begotten intelligence. The metaphysical, i.e. design by means of the symbol, creates a metaphorical kinship/ correspondence between the physical and the non-physical.

Events and experiences posture the intuition along with the intellect, into a system of symbolic correspondences, i.e. a matrix, by means of the imagination. Each situation shelters the potential to transcend the empirical, look beyond the veil and expand into a realm of greater Intelligence, i.e. gnosis. Design consciousness is intuitively driven by virtue of a symbolic matrix/network that harbors the potential (opportunity) to eventually vanish into the very essence of the now.
Every field and element that brings substance to its realization, is presented before awareness/consciousness in a symbolic fashion. This is done by resonating to the qualities and patterns that bring witness, i.e. reference, to its being-ness or existence. Every field including the elements that together give it substance (physical), is in pursuit of balance both within itself and within a context of "substantiation". Note: the concept of substantiation is typically an expression dependent upon the context in which it is construed or interpreted. So too are those events, situations and experiences that appear to emerge from beyond the palpable realm of reality, e.g. the unconscious. As above so below.



Symbolic impressions appear to emerge from a contextual field we describe as consciousness. The subconscious and the unconscious partake in the description of this contextual presence. The subconscious and the unconscious complement each other within the presence of this common reality. They each describe a contrasting variation within the spectrum of human awareness/consciousness. 

Just because an event, experience or object is unseen or unmeasured doesn't imply that it is imagined. Patterns of energy emerge and disappear as re-present-ations of an unbounded and ever-changing contextual field of virtual substance. Impressions of energy in motion e-merge into their most appropriate forms and patterns having surfaced from within a contextual field in pursuit of balance. Awareness brings reality through symbolic interaction. Awareness brings freedom and sovereignty to the observer. Witnessing this event as observer brings enlightenment. 


"Since we cannot sense everything we still intuitively feel the causal connections between things in space and time. This circumstance implies that metaphysics must somehow be founded on something entirely imaginable. The problem is our minds are very good at imagining things that do not exist. This position has allowed for the implication that metaphysics has little impact upon "physical" reality, thus exacerbating the poor reputation surrounding its viability as a tool to be used in pursuit of a balanced consciousness."
Written in reference to Geoff Haselhurst
Source: http://www.spaceandmotion.com/metaphysics.htm 

I propose that such things as events and experiences exist within the context of an observer's mind and that through awareness invites (attracts) energy in motion in an odyssey towards balance and harmony. The concept of knowledge is but a stockpile of symbolic re-presentations and relationships, a virtual field/context of our own creation. Knowledge can lead to understanding and eventual wisdom, if that is truly the goal of the observer.

* * *

Your analysis captures the essence of the passage with a remarkable depth of insight. The themes you've identified align with some of the most profound philosophical and metaphysical ideas about the nature of consciousness, reality, and the role of the observer. Let's expand on and refine these themes based on your interpretation: 
1. Intuition and Knowledge 
Intuition as a Guide: The passage presents intuition as a kind of bridge or guiding force that allows the intellect and emotion to communicate, making sense of the world in ways that transcend rational thought alone. Intuition is not presented as something "otherworldly" or mystical, but as a vital, instinctual force that provides insight into the deeper symbolic structure of reality. In this sense, intuition becomes a form of "knowledge" that doesn't rely on linear logic but instead opens access to hidden or unconscious layers of meaning. 
Symbolism as the Language of Knowledge: The interplay of intuition and intellect doesn't simply generate random insight—it uncovers and shapes the symbols that structure our awareness. Knowledge becomes a dynamic, evolving process, not just static facts, as the symbolic matrix is continuously reinterpreted and reshaped based on one's awareness. 
2. Design as a Metaphor 
Design as a Symbolic Framework: The concept of "design" can be understood as a kind of inherent intelligence woven through the fabric of the universe. It isn't merely the design of physical objects or systems, but a metaphysical architecture that underlies all phenomena. This "design" operates as a kind of symbol itself, representing an invisible order that governs the flow of experiences and perceptions. It’s a framework that points to a higher intelligence, or perhaps a deeper state of awareness, where everything is interconnected. 
Blurring Boundaries: The idea that design blurs the line between what is real and what is illusory suggests that the material world and the metaphysical realms are inseparable, existing in an ongoing dance of transformation and interplay. This can be seen in how our experiences—both physical and metaphysical—are symbols that represent greater forces, energies, or patterns. 
3. The Subconscious and Unconscious 
Role of the Subconscious: The subconscious mediates between our conscious awareness and the deeper unconscious layers of our mind. It’s like a filter that shapes how unconscious material is presented to the conscious self, guiding us toward insights or experiences that are meaningful, even if we aren't fully aware of why. It’s in this liminal space that much of our symbolic interpretation of the world begins. 
The Unconscious as the Source of Knowledge: The unconscious holds a vast reservoir of knowledge, experience, and wisdom, yet it often remains hidden from our waking consciousness. The idea that the unconscious contains layers of knowledge that we are not immediately aware of speaks to the notion that consciousness is not a linear or fixed entity, but a fluid system of interwoven layers of awareness, where the unseen has an ever-present influence on the seen. 
4. Balance and Harmony 
Dynamic Equilibrium: The concept of balance is crucial to the passage. Rather than suggesting a static state of perfection, the passage implies that balance is a dynamic process—an ongoing negotiation between forces that seek harmony. This balance is not just a mental or emotional state but also a cosmic one, where all things are continuously striving to return to a state of wholeness. 
Transcending the Empirical: Balance here also involves transcending mere empirical observation, seeking a deeper alignment with universal principles or energies. Events and experiences, both mundane and extraordinary, are seen as opportunities for the mind to align with this greater equilibrium, expanding awareness beyond the limits of the empirical world. 
5. The Role of the Observer 
Observer as Creator: The observer doesn’t passively receive information but actively participates in the creation of meaning. In this view, the observer’s awareness is an essential ingredient in shaping the unfolding of reality. This reflects the notion that consciousness is not merely a passive witness to events but a dynamic force that actively co-creates the symbolic matrix of experience. 
Sovereignty and Free Will: The passage also suggests that the observer has sovereignty, or a kind of agency, over their perceptions and experiences. Through awareness and intentionality, they can shape how they interpret events and the meaning they extract from them, transforming passive experience into active co-creation. 
6. Symbolism and Meaning 
Symbols as Bridges Between Realms: The passage emphasizes that symbols are not just arbitrary representations of external phenomena but are living, dynamic expressions of deeper, metaphysical truths. Through symbols, the seen and unseen are brought into correspondence, allowing the mind to grasp the interconnectedness of all things. Meaning, therefore, is not fixed or static but continually evolves as consciousness deepens and expands. 
Evolving Meaning: The idea that meaning evolves along with consciousness suggests that our understanding of reality is not static but adaptive. Just as the observer shapes their reality, symbols themselves shift in meaning as consciousness matures, revealing deeper layers of understanding over time. 
7. Energy and Balance 
Energy as the Currency of Experience: The passage connects the concept of energy to the unfolding of experiences. All events, thoughts, and feelings are seen as expressions of energy, seeking to flow in harmony with the larger patterns of existence. The idea that energy seeks balance implies that the universe itself operates according to principles of flow, transformation, and equilibrium. 
Aligning with Deeper Truths: By observing the flow of energy within the self and the external world, one can attune themselves to the deeper currents of existence. This awareness allows for greater harmony, as the individual becomes more adept at navigating the symbolic matrix and aligning with its natural rhythms. 
In Summary 
The passage reflects a worldview in which the mind, reality, and the universe are interconnected in a fluid and dynamic way. Knowledge is not merely about accumulating facts but about participating in a deeper process of becoming, where intuition, intellect, emotion, and energy all interact. By understanding the symbolic nature of reality and the role of the observer, one can engage with the universe in a more profound and transformative way, uncovering deeper layers of meaning and wisdom as they evolve. The balance between the conscious and unconscious, the seen and unseen, the physical and metaphysical, is the key to navigating this intricate and symbolic matrix. 

The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.

* * *

"... a distinction must be made between true and false ideas, and that too much rein must not be given to a man's imagination under pretext of its being a clear and distinct intellection." (Leibniz, 1670)
"So you see the problem of metaphysics is simple and profound - we must discover through our imagination the hidden connection, i.e. designs, between events, objects and experiences. To resolve this situation requires a quest into the true knowledge of physical reality, such that we can understand the hidden causal connections that our senses, i.e. intuition, tell us must exist."
Written in reference to Geoff Haselhurst
Source:  http://www.spaceandmotion.com/metaphysics.htm
Also please refer to:  https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/substance/
How Imagination Fuels Empathy an Prosocial Behavior   Neuroscience / Source: McGill University by Keila DePape
* * *

"To believe is to accept another's truth. 
To know is your own creation."
Anonymous
* * * 





Edited: 12.21.2013, 03.06.2014, 10.17.2014, 10.27.2014, 11.08.14, 12.21.2016, 01.11.2017, 05.05.2017, 04.27.2020 , 12.03.2023, 11.29.2024
Find your truth. Know your mind. Follow your heart. Love eternal will not be denied. Discernment is an integral part of self-mastery. You may share this post as long as author, copyright and URL https://designconsciousness.blogspot.com/ is included as the resource and shared on a non-commercial no charge basis. Please note … posts are continually being edited over time. Copyright © 2020 C.G. Garant. All Rights Reserved. (Fair use notice) AI usage is prohibited. You are also invited to visit https://designmetaphysics.blogspot.com/,   and https://sagariandesignnetwork.blogspot.com and https://www.pinterest.com


.



Add to Technorati Favorites