Conceptual impressions surrounding this post are yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network.
All is vibration. In essence vibration participates in the emergence of a quantum field of virtual potential (QFVP) that might well be likened to Consciousness. Design describes this observation as in-form-ation - energy discovered and interpreted as a language in symbolic transformation appearing from within the parameters of its own field of awareness/observation.
Design attempts to reveal through a set of conditions and circumstances, certain symbolic attempts to define and describe the meaning and purpose underpinning a particular object, process, event or experience. Like consciousness this phenomenon continues ad infinitum both prior to and after dimensional re-presentation.
“God is a circle whose center is everywhere and whose circumference is nowhere”
"The circle is a universal symbol with extensive meaning. It represents the notions of totality, wholeness, original perfection, the Self, the infinite, eternity, timelessness, all cyclic movement, God The circle is a two-dimensional shadow of the sphere which is regarded throughout cultural history as an icon of the ineffable oneness; the indivisible fulfillment of the Universe. All other symbols and geometries reflect various aspects of the profound and consummate perfection of the circle, sphere and other higher dimensional forms of these we might imagine.
The ratio of the circumference of a circle to its diameter, Pi, is the original transcendental and irrational number. (Pi equals about 3.14159265358979323846264338327950288419716939937511...) It cannot be expressed in terms of the ratio of two whole numbers, or in the language of sacred symbolism, the essence of the circle exists in a dimension that transcends the linear rationality that it contains. Our holistic perspectives, feelings and intuitions encompass the finite elements of the ideas that are within them, yet have a greater wisdom than can be expressed by those ideas alone."
http://www.fractal.org/Bewustzijns-Besturings-Model/Sacred-Geometry.htm
The mathematical challenge of squaring the circle originated with the ancient Greek mathematicians and geometers. The problem was to construct for a given circle a square with the same area as the circle, all to be done with only a compass and straightedge. It was repeatedly demonstrated that the challenge was impossible to do. The circle represented woman, spirit and infinite wholeness, the square man, earthly circumstances and all things material. Ancient Greek philosophers distinguished all things material within the context of fours, e.g. the seasons of the year, the elements of earth, air, fire and water. Squaring the circle was proven to be algebraically impossible until 1882 when the Lindermann-Weierstrass theorem proved that pi π is transcendental and not an algebraic irrational number.
“Philosophically and spiritually, to square the circle means to see equally in four directions—up, down, in, and out—and to be whole, complete, and free. Circles often represent the spiritual because they are infinite—they have no end. The square is often a symbol of the material because of the number of physical things that come in fours, such as four seasons, four directions, and the four physical elements—earth, air, fire, and water, according to ancient Greek philosopher Empedocles—not to mention its solid appearance. The union of man and woman in alchemy is a merging of spiritual and physical natures. The triangle is then a symbol of the resulting union of body, mind, and soul. In the 17th century, squaring the circle had not yet been proved impossible. However, it was a puzzle no one had been known to solve. Alchemy was viewed very similarly: It was something few if any had ever fully completed. The study of alchemy was as much about the journey as the goal, as no one might ever actually forge a philosopher’s stone.” Catherine Beyer https://www.learnreligions.com/squaring-the-circle-96039
The Classical Elements"Classical elements typically refer to water, earth, fire, air, and (later) aether, which were proposed to explain the nature and complexity of all matter in terms of simpler substances.[1][2]Ancient cultures in Greece, Ancient Egypt, Persia, Babylonia, Japan, Tibet, and India had all similar lists, sometimes referring in local languages to "air" as "wind" and the fifth element as "void". The Chinese Wu Xing system lists Wood (木 mù), Fire (火 huǒ), Earth (土 tǔ), Metal (金 jīn), and Water (水 shuǐ), though these are described more as energies or transitions rather than as types of material. These different cultures and even individual philosophers had widely varying explanations concerning their attributes and how they related to observable phenomena as well as cosmology. Sometimes these theories overlapped with mythology and were personified in deities. Some of these interpretations included atomism (the idea of very small, indivisible portions of matter), but other interpretations considered the elements to be divisible into infinitely small pieces without changing their nature."1. Boyd, T.J.M. ; Sanderson, J.J. (2003) The physics of Plasmas, Cambridge University Press.p.1 ISBN9780521459129. LLCCN 20020246542. Ball, P. (2004). The Elements: A Very Short Introduction. Very Short Introductions. OUP Oxford. p.33. ISBN8970191578250https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Classical_element
The Four Elements"The four elements[edit] Empedocles established four ultimate elements which make all the structures in the world—fire, air, water, earth.[32][43] Empedocles called these four elements "roots", which he also identified with the mythical names of Zeus, Hera, Nestis, and Aidoneus[44]"32 Wallace, William (1911) "Empedocles" In Chisolm, Hugh (ed). Encyclopedia Britannica. 9 (11th ed.) Cambridge University Press. pp. 344-345.43. Frag. B17 (Simplicius, Physics, 157-159)44. Frag.B6 (Sextus Empiricus, Against the Mathematicians. x.315)https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Empedocles
What might be the elements or "roots" needed to explain the nature of Design? What might be the basis from which we can describe and or comprehend design in reference to a "nature" that surrounds and penetrates and brings reflection to every event and experience? But first we must be willing to accept the premise that Design is transcendental. Likened to the inability to square the circle and finalizing the value of π Design is just as immeasurable and just as never ending. Design is simultaneously visible and invisible, transitory, transforming, transcending, adaptive and timelessly changing in time. idea noun Philosophy (in Platonic thought) an eternally existing pattern of which individual things in any class are imperfect copies. • (in Kantian thought) a concept of pure reason, not empirically based in experience.complementary adjective. combining in such a way as to enhance or emphasize the qualities of each other or another: three guitarists playing interlocking, complementary parts | Internet technology is actually complementary to traditional technologies.
No new event or experience can exactly parallel the meaning or purpose symbolically ingrained in past events and experiences. Impressions from all these experiences are the products of our imagination. All events and experiences are extremely complex, symbolic in character and appropriately configured for the time and space in which they occur, both past and present. All observations and perceptions are symbolic cognitions and figments of the imagination. Our experiences appear to be real because they've been imagined in a "timely" framework and found to be appropriate for a particular space and time. Energy in motion is how we might describe time in a linear fashion, interpretations of experiences and events that together bring relevance to our concept of Reality (POV). Remembrances are linked together by design, i.e. signs, symbols, metaphors, analogies, etc. that together veil design's hidden language affecting our images, thoughts, feelings and sensations from the past, the present and into the future. These engaging states of mind create their own field of energy, guided by feelings and impressions that in linear time, can alter our POV. Together they contribute to our concept of Reality. These thoughtful engagements allow our imagination to adapt to every situation we may encounter, formless impressions from a quantum field of virtual potential.
Humanity survives by means of its ability to symbolically imagine, observe, perceive and create by design.
3,700-year-old Babylonian Stone Table gets Translated, Changes History
Reality can best be described in the moment. Clear, concise, intentions are energized through symbolic interpretation, adjustment and adaptability. Realities self-truths are timelessly cloaked in a POV veiled both in form and formlessness.
Your source of origin will be revealed to you while observing yourself in the moment ... imagination notwithstanding.
"Nowness or the magic of the present moment is what joins the wisdom of the past with the present."Chogyam Trungpa
Find balance and harmony about the core of a central presence you know is Real at the moment. There are many moving parts involved in the process of acknowledging the singularity within. You are an observer, a personalized awareness symbolically known, felt and impossible to measure. Your center marks a point surrounded by a field of energy, light and information in perpetual change, a point where the squaring of the circle meets within the parameters of space and time.
Design is a concept whose methods of abstraction are symbolic in representation. Design is real but not capable of being fully described or explained through simple logic. Design is transcendental and like consciousness is presupposed, a priori and fundamental to Life. All signs are at the root of design.
Beauty is the only concept in space and time where the idea of perfection can be vividly felt and/or fully experienced. Beauty brings to form and formlessness a third type of non-duality.
The circle attracts energy-in-motion towards its center. A one pointed focus of energy cannot be sensed without motion nor understood without direction, it will always be an obstruction in the path of science. Energy trans-form-ations appear as reflections in the Light of observation. Within this context the circle finds its purpose by virtue of its meaning and meaning by virtue of its purpose. To find balance in all fields energy in motion they must all be designed.
The line possesses the potential for creating an assemblage of forms where wholeness might be rediscovered, remastered, redirected, refined and realized. The line is the vector that incorporates the geometry of the Cosmos. Every dance between line and circle has a meaning and a purpose in a complementary quest for harmony - a grand Design that symbolically veils the Source of its perfection.
"The Ancient of Days", William Blake
The observer is central to every circle whose focus is appointed by intention. The act of observing appears as a disturbance within a quantum field of virtual potential, i.e. a position of single pointedness is known by means of its impression upon the greater whole. The point becomes a line giving direction (measure) to its purpose and meaning to its intent. A point is a line in motion. (see Design Metaphysics: Design In Motion)
Multidimensional and holistic in essence the point no longer appears pointless as it hurls through a field of virtual potential. Splitting from itself for purposes of self realization, the point becomes both one (particle) and the same (wave) - expanding beyond pointlessness (line, wave, geometry) a reflection of its self returns to its pointedness (center, source, intent). Experience invites an expansion and contraction of the field within. Forms emerge and disappear in a feedback loop that never ends. What was once real now changes every moment. Projection, reflection, internalization, illumination ... cyclically spiraling, expanding and contracting in a Design revealed in moments of timeless Awareness.
Design is irrational. Design can be imagined, but not always measured.
Design is not as precise as mathematics would like it to be, yet without it nothing would add up.
The design process is dependent upon the proper use of language made in reference to the concept of coherent resonance. If a common language, i.e. system of symbolic impression and interpretation, is not appropriately pre-determined, agreed upon and adhered to through a shared and accepted understanding, truth will surely be lost in interpretation, transformation and transcendence This is an extremely difficult position to comply with and adapt to considering the fact that change is a constant and most reactive when observed from within a quantum field of virtual potential (QFVP).
An observer never stands alone for there will always appear a context upon reflection.
No comments:
Post a Comment