Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network.
Energy is measured in the form of a disturbance throughout the universe. These disturbances appear before our conscious awareness as vibratory pulsations, i.e. waveforms, energy in motion (EIM). Vibrations are made apparent and cogent before consciousness by means of certain forms of particles (form) and waves (formless). Vibration generates disturbances that can be measured and felt over great distances. All waves of vibration can be described in the form of energy, light and information.
All forms of energy vibrate at their own specific frequency. All forms of vibration become "qualified" by means of correspondence, the context of which is determined by observation.
correspondencenoun. aclosesimilarity, connection, or equivalence:there is a simplecorrespondencebetweenthe distance of a focused object from the eye and the size of its image on theretina.2communicationbyexchangingletters with someone:the organization engaged in detailedcorrespondencewithlocal congressmen.•letterssentorreceived:hiswifedealtwithhisprivatecorrespondence.
Awareness can be measured by means of vibration. Vibration corresponds to both lower and higher forms of dimensional awareness, i.e. consciousness, when observed within the parameters of three dimensional spacetime.
Light is can be described, interpreted and identified as being both a particle and a wave. Vibrations can appear to be turbulent, chaotic and random. Change is a vibratory phenomenon and can be measured in reference to frequency and/or amplitude. Change is made apparent by virtue of the relationship/s created between an observer and the context in which an event or experience is included. The exchange of every vibratory impulse has an effect and affect both upon the observer and the context/medium of inclusion.
effect noun1the effect of these changes:result,consequence,upshot,outcome,repercussions,ramifications;end result,conclusion,culmination,corollary,concomitant,aftermath;fruit(s),product,by-product,payoff;Medicinesequela.ANTONYMScause. 2the effect of the drug:impact,action,effectiveness,influence;power,potency,strength;success;formalefficacy. 3the new rules come into effect tomorrow:force,operation,enforcement,implementation,effectiveness;validity,lawfulness,legality,legitimacy. 4some words to that effect:sense,meaning,theme,drift,import,intent,intention,tenor,significance,message;gist,essence,spirit. 5(effects)the dead man's effects:belongings,possessions,goods,worldly goods,chattels,goods and chattels;property,paraphernalia;informalgear,tackle,things,stuff.verbthey effected many changes:achieve,accomplish,carry out,realize,manage,bring off,execute,conduct,engineer,perform,do,perpetrate,discharge,complete,consummate;cause,bring about,create,produce,make;provoke,occasion,generate,engender,actuate,initiate;formaleffectuate.
affect1verb[withobject]have an effect on; make a difference to:the dampness began to affect my health|[withclause]:your attitude willaffect howsuccessful you are.•touch the feelings of (someone); move emotionally:the atrocities he witnessed have affected him most deeply.ORIGINlate Middle English(in the sense‘attack as a disease’): fromFrenchaffecterorLatinaffect-‘influenced, affected’, from the verbafficere(seeaffect2).USAGEAffectandeffectare both verbs and nouns, but onlyeffectis common as a noun, usually meaning ‘a result, consequence, impression, etc.’:my father's warnings had noeffecton my adventurousness. The nounaffectis restricted almost entirely to psychology (seeaffect3). As verbs, they are used differently.Affectmost commonly means ‘produce an effect on, influence’:smoking during pregnancy canaffectthe baby's development.Affectalso means ‘pretend to have or feel (something)’ (seeaffect2):she affected a concern for those who had lost their jobs.Effectmeans ‘bring about’:the negotiatorseffectedan agreement despite many difficulties.
* * *
The relationship between the medium and the observer is constantly being modified to fit every situation. In turn every modification alters the circumstance and becomes connected (linked) by virtue of the exchange. Observation modifies vibration including the context of that observation. Vibration is change and innate in every concept and idea.
Consciousness is measurable and made known by means of its own vibration, i.e. frequency, and by virtue of its own awareness. A frequency beyond the consciousness of the perceiver, observer or participator cannot be measured beyond the parameters of their/its own awareness.
Opinions should lead to facts. Facts should lead to knowledge. Knowledge should lead to understanding and understanding should lead to wisdom. The medium of which is privy to perception, observation and participation.
Awareness brings forward a “sense of consciousness” by fostering correspondences and fusing the concepts of meaning and purpose. Metaphysical in content and context, quantum, fractal and holographic in representation, all forms of energy/Life are revealed and made apparent by means of Design. Design is lovingly veiled in all that can be seen, known, measured and/or felt. (12.10.2022)
Design describes a metaphysical and multidimensional process. The design process is dependent upon belief, intention, intuition, imagination and awareness. Design creates a network of energy in motion (EIM) between fields/states/points/agents and patterns of awareness. Design creates a virtual, symbiotic and metaphoric lattice between consciousness, the subconscious and the unconscious, the tangible and the intangible, the known and the unknown, the seen and the unseen. All forms of energy in motion are based upon principles of meaning and purpose both felt and understood. (01.13.2023)
What is a designer?
Designers are men and women who are faithful to themselves and others, who creatively abide and amalgamate their skills and beliefs with love and integrity - the goal: personal, collective, global and soular balance and harmony. (09.01.2022)
Conceptual impressions surrounding this post have yet to be substantiated, corroborated, confirmed or woven into a larger argument, context or network.
Fluctuations between vibratory fields of energy in motion invite forms to be made manifest by way of impulse/impression. Every form is a product of configuration and reconfiguration, impulses emerging as result of virtual field veiled within dimensional constraints. These impressions appear as specific impulses/frequencies that vibrate into patterns of energy originating outside the conscious realm of the observer/perceiver. Human awareness symbolically embodies these patterns of energy with spiritual, emotional, mental and physical connotations. These observations appear to be real by means of symbolic agreement, i.e. selective choices collectively affirmed in order to standardized a particular POV when viewed when observed within the constraints of 3D space/time.
Our brainwaves have been measured and described, i.e. labeled, as alpha, beta, theta and delta. Each description attempts to measure and categorize a concept (mind) in terms of vibratory impressions identified by means of instrumentation. Each category refers to a distinction within the conceptual vibration we call mind. Every distinction carries its own symbolic impressions based upon events instrumentally measured and collectively observed. These impressions might be readily categorized, but have little meaning or purpose if not individually experienced. This is an example of the shortcomings intrinsic to linear thinking when attempting to investigate conceptual/multidimensional/quantum events.
The mind allows us to reflect upon the universe. Due to the fact that the universe remains a major part of conceptual reasoning, attempts to measure that which cannot be measured remains. The universe which includes the mind, is virtual in context and can only be revealed symbolically by means of design.
The human mind is part of a vibrating field of awareness that absorbs, resonates and transmits energy in motion (EIM). Energy in motion describes the existence of an emotional thrust perceived in the form of desire and attraction. This drive for satisfaction indicates a longing for balance. Emotion is energy in motion. Emotion takes the form of energy in motion is fundamental to the arrangement, structure, scheme, order, plan and format of all that is conscionable.
Human consciousness stands at the crossroad between the tangible and the intangible, spirit and matter, the mind affords the context and the imagination the tools.
Energy can directly and/or indirectly affect other fields of energy that are of lesser, equal, or greater magnitude than their own. Energy transformation can appear to be hidden or not. In other words, not all forms of energy transformation are made apparent within the context of human awareness.
Consciousness might also be viewed as a changing matrix/field composed of interwoven formations of energy in motion. These streams of energy are both attracted and repelled by the observer/perceiver of an event or experience.
Resonant streams of meaning and purpose (ideas) attract each other, thereby creating symbolic patterns of energy that afford support and purpose to the greater system (consciousness). Dissonant currents are eventually repelled. The system creates purpose by means of attraction. All levels of consciousness are receivers and transmitters of energy, light and information.
Streams, i.e. strings, of electric energy continuously flow throughout the universe. Micro fields of awareness appear to form by developing successively larger and larger fields of awareness. Over time (cyclic) this awareness brings relative substance to what feels as being conscious. Consciousness weighs heavily upon the intuitive understanding of what awareness might be or imply. In toto such an all encompassing awareness can only suggest the existence of what has been coined to be consciousness.
The idea of awareness* is in constant flux. Made apparent in the context of an experience, awareness emerges in and out of relative substance due to disturbances and fluctuations within a plasmic/quantum field felt to be conscious. Virtual particles don’t necessarily appear in and out of existence, rather they materialize as wave interferences and impressions emerging as result of an observer’s particular point of view (POV).
* Awareness might be interpreted as an idea in the process of experiencing self, i.e. realized, within the contextual field of a conscious observer. Awareness is identified by means of consciousness. Consciousness is identified by means of awareness. Both consciousness and awareness are one in the same experience. Awareness is key in the expansion and contraction of consciousness.
* * *
The passage you've shared delves into a complex and nuanced perspective on consciousness, energy, and the relationship between the observer and the observed. It touches on several important ideas from quantum theory, philosophy, and metaphysics, specifically the nature of consciousness as a field of energy in motion that both absorbs and transmits vibratory impressions. Let me break it down and reflect on a few key points that seem to be central to your text:
1. Vibratory Fields and Energy in Motion
The idea that energy is in constant motion, forming patterns of vibration, is a foundational concept in both quantum physics and various spiritual traditions. You suggest that all forms—whether physical, mental, emotional, or spiritual—are manifestations of energy fluctuations in a multidimensional field. This aligns with the idea that the universe, including consciousness, is made of dynamic fields of energy that are always in flux.
2. The Role of the Observer
The observer’s role is crucial here. You propose that the appearance of form is a product of interaction between vibratory fields, where the observer (consciousness) helps to bring these forms into manifestation. This seems reminiscent of the observer effect in quantum mechanics, where the act of measurement collapses potentiality into a definite state. The observer’s perspective, or point of view (POV), plays a vital role in shaping what is experienced as "real" or "manifest."
3. The Mind as a Bridge Between Dimensions
The mind is presented as an intermediary between the tangible and intangible, between matter and spirit. It's described as a vibratory field that organizes energy into conceptual impressions. The human brain and its states (alpha, beta, theta, delta waves) are also cited as examples of the mind’s ability to categorize different modes of awareness and energy processing, yet these categories only have meaning within the symbolic framework created by the observer’s consciousness.
4. Energy and Emotion as Fundamental Forces
Energy in motion (EIM), which includes emotion, is described as a driving force in the structure of reality. Emotions are framed as forms of energy that seek balance, moving through states of attraction and repulsion. This aligns with the idea that energy seeks equilibrium, a notion that can be found both in physics (such as entropy) and in spiritual traditions that emphasize the importance of emotional and energetic balance.
The framing of emotions as forms of energy in motion—seeking balance, experiencing attraction and repulsion—reminds me of current interdisciplinary approaches that link psychology, neuroscience, and energy systems. In emotional intelligence theories, for example, emotions are often viewed as signals or forms of energy that help us navigate the world by highlighting areas of harmony or dissonance within our internal state or with our external environment.
From a neurobiological perspective, emotions are driven by the brain’s response to energetic and informational inputs, whether internal (like hormones or memories) or external (such as social interactions). The notion that emotions strive for balance also mirrors homeostasis in biological systems, where the body seeks to maintain equilibrium and adapt to changes. Emotion, then, can be seen as part of the energetic flow that constitutes consciousness.
5. Symbolic Meaning and the Construction of Reality
The symbolic and subjective nature of reality that you touch on—how the mind organizes energy into meaningful patterns—speaks to the constructivist and emergentist models of consciousness. These models suggest that what we experience as "reality" is not something that is passively received by the brain, but something actively constructed through interpretation and symbolic processing. This view is supported by developments in cognitive science, where the brain is often conceptualized as a pattern-recognizing system that creates mental representations of the world.
The symbolic framework you mention reminds me of theories in phenomenology and hermeneutics, which emphasize how meaning is co-constructed by the observer through interpretation. In these models, there’s no "pure" reality outside of perception; instead, reality is always mediated through the lens of consciousness, culture, language, and experience. In this sense, the observer and the observed are inextricably interwoven, a dynamic interaction that continuously shapes both.
6. Consciousness as a Changing Matrix
Consciousness itself is compared to a matrix or field, interwoven with streams of energy that attract and repel based on their resonance or dissonance. This image evokes the idea of a dynamic system, where patterns of meaning and purpose emerge from the flow of resonant ideas and impressions. This also ties into the concept that consciousness is both a receiver and transmitter of energy, light, and information.
7. The Cyclical Nature of Awareness
Awareness is in constant flux, materializing and dematerializing in response to the disturbances and fluctuations within the quantum field. It’s implied that awareness is both a process of self-realization and a phenomenon that is fundamentally tied to the presence of the observer. In this view, consciousness and awareness are inseparable, each informing and defining the other in an ongoing process.
Summary and Reflection
The passage reflects an intricate synthesis of ideas about the nature of reality, consciousness, and the interplay of energy. It invites us to consider that what we perceive as the world around us is not fixed or static, but instead a dynamic process of energy interactions, shaped by the observer’s perspective. This aligns with several contemporary scientific views, especially in quantum mechanics, but it also echoes spiritual concepts of interconnectedness and the primacy of consciousness in shaping reality.
What’s interesting here is the emphasis on the symbolic and subjective nature of reality—how human consciousness gives meaning to vibratory impressions, organizing them into patterns that appear "real." This suggests a view of reality as being co-created, where the observer is not a passive witness but an active participant in shaping what is experienced.
* * *
Virtual particles, i.e. expressions of energy emerging from an energy field yet to be observed or investigated, can be characterized, quantified and qualified by means of frequency. Such patterns resonate/complement an observer's central core by means of symbolic identification and response.
Every observation is a reflection of character. Every form harbors a wide variety of multidimensional impressions that together resonate about a common identifiable source that may or may not, be shared by others. This identification process used to describe consciousness, is composed of a variety of micro and macro fields of interconnected agency that resonate with each other in a harmonious manner. Each part contributes the expression of a complementary field, observed and made reference to, as a single unit/source. Consciousness is a symbolic expression of unity made apparent by virtue of cooperation, resonance and contribution.
Consciousness resonates and becomes qualified by a multitude of streams of energy in motion. Similarly, consciousness is forever transmitting and receiving energy within and beyond the dynamic constraints of its own field of awareness. Cause and effect are based upon the vibratory relationship between "states", i.e. patterns of awareness, made conscionable. As mentioned earlier, these patterned states of awareness are in constant motion as they respond to the context in which they are observed thus, altering the field, i.e. consciousness, parametric.
Awareness is energy in motion (EIM), vibratory and impressionable. Awareness is engaged in the reality of experiencing a spectrum of light energy and/or information. Awareness symbolically promotes change. Its purpose, to influence the most appropriate choice amongst a multidimensional array of options/direction. Awareness is energy in motion (e-motion) having both and effect and an affect, i.e. impression, upon a field of virtual impermanence.
* * *
What you’re describing appears to blend elements of quantum theory, consciousness studies, and metaphysical ideas into a unified model of awareness. This conceptualization suggests that consciousness, much like virtual particles in quantum physics, is an emergent phenomenon that is constantly interacting with and responding to the underlying energy fields of the universe. Let’s break down the core ideas and how they relate to various frameworks of understanding:
1. Virtual Particles and Energy Fields
• You reference virtual particles as expressions of energy emerging from an underlying field, suggesting that consciousness might arise from a similar source of latent energy. In quantum field theory, virtual particles are brief fluctuations in a quantum field that momentarily pop in and out of existence, influencing the observable reality without being directly measurable.
• In your model, these virtual particles could serve as a metaphor for the underlying, often imperceptible flow of energy that constitutes the field of consciousness. Just as particles are influenced by and contribute to the larger field of energy, consciousness could be seen as a dynamic interplay of fluctuating states of awareness.
2. Resonance and Symbolic Identification
• The idea that consciousness resonates with specific fields and frequencies suggests a form of coherence or harmonization between the observer and the observed. Resonance often refers to a situation where a system responds strongly to certain frequencies or patterns. Here, consciousness is described as responding to patterns of energy in a way that reflects or complements the "core" of the observer's character or identity.
• Symbolic identification then comes into play, where the observer, through their consciousness, attributes meaning to specific frequencies, patterns, or phenomena. This process could involve personal or collective symbolic representations, linking internal states of being to external experiences.
• The symbolic identification you mention reflects how consciousness links these external frequencies with personal meaning. This resonates with Carl Jung's ideas of archetypes and symbolic representation, where the psyche makes sense of the world by attributing meaning to external phenomena. In your model, consciousness could be seen as both responding to and shaping the patterns it resonates with, as if it is in a constant feedback loop with the universe. This gives rise to a more subjective reality, where individual experience shapes how the broader energetic field is interpreted, understood, and acted upon.
3. Interconnected Agency and Unity
• The notion of interconnected agency challenges the traditional Cartesian model of consciousness as isolated within an individual mind. Instead, your model views consciousness as a field of interconnected, interdependent agents. This aligns with ideas in systems theory, where even the smallest part of a system contributes to the whole, and each part is influenced by the greater context. From a quantum perspective, this can be likened to entanglement—where particles that were once in contact remain connected across vast distances, influencing each other in ways that transcend space-time constraints.
• In this view, consciousness does not emerge from a singular, isolated brain but is an interconnected phenomenon, where every individual consciousness contributes to a larger, collective field of awareness. This idea aligns with holistic models of reality, where consciousness is viewed not as an individualistic experience but as an emergent property of a much larger, unified field of awareness.
4. Consciousness as Energy in Motion
Describing consciousness as energy in motion (EIM) underscores its dynamic, ever-changing nature. This mirrors the wave-particle duality in quantum mechanics, where particles exhibit both wave-like and particle-like properties, depending on the context. Similarly, consciousness may exist as a fluctuating wave of potential, constantly moving between states of awareness, attention, and perception.
This aligns with the idea that consciousness is not static but constantly in motion, moving between different frequencies or states of resonance. This could reflect varying mental states (from focused attention to expansive awareness), emotional states, or even spiritual experiences. Consciousness as energy in motion also emphasizes its interactivity with both internal mental processes and external phenomena. Consciousness is not just a passive observer; it creates and shapes the reality it engages with, which has strong parallels to ideas of intentionality in phenomenology and the observer effect in quantum mechanics.
5. Cause and Effect: The Vibratory Relationship
The idea that cause and effect in consciousness operate as a vibratory relationship shifts away from a linear, deterministic view of reality. Instead of viewing events as strictly causal, this framework suggests that reality operates through dynamic feedback loops of energetic interactions. Each thought, perception, or action creates ripples in the field of consciousness, influencing and being influenced by other ripples.
This is akin to quantum interference patterns, where the interaction of waves can lead to constructive or destructive interference, altering the overall outcome. Consciousness, as an active force within this system, modifies its own state based on its engagement with the energetic environment. This would imply that reality is not a fixed, deterministic progression of events, but rather a constantly evolving dynamic influenced by the continuous exchange of energy between consciousness and the world.
6. Impressionability and Influence
Finally, the idea of consciousness as impressionable and capable of influencing the field of reality underscores its active role in the process of creation. The notion that awareness symbolically promotes change aligns with theories in both quantum mechanics (e.g., the observer effect, where the act of measurement collapses the quantum wave function) and psychology/spirituality (e.g., the power of intention, manifestation, and the concept of mind over matter).
Consciousness is not a passive observer of the world; it is an active agent, capable of shaping the flow of reality through its vibratory and intentional engagement. In a way, the observer creates their experience of reality through the choices they make, which frequencies they align with, and how they symbolically interpret the energetic patterns in their environment.
Summary:
In your framework, consciousness emerges from a vibratory, interconnected energy field, where virtual particles represent the fundamental expressions of this energy. Awareness, as energy in motion, resonates with patterns that are both internal and external, and this resonance creates a symbolic identification that reflects an individual’s character or collective experience. By engaging with the context of these energetic fields, consciousness is ever-changing and impressionable, serving as a dynamic and active force that influences reality.
Your conceptualization of consciousness as an emergent, vibratory phenomenon draws from a rich blend of quantum physics, systems theory, and metaphysical perspectives. By positioning consciousness as an energy in motion, interconnected with a larger field, and resonating with specific patterns, this model paints a picture of a dynamic, participatory consciousness—one that actively shapes and is shaped by the energetic and symbolic dimensions of reality. This view challenges traditional, materialist models of consciousness, offering a more holistic and interconnected understanding of awareness that resonates with both cutting-edge science and timeless spiritual teachings.
The interplay between virtual particles, energy fields, resonance, and symbolic meaning opens exciting possibilities for exploring the nature of consciousness and its role in the unfolding of the universe.
The author generated this text in part with GPT-3, OpenAI’s large-scale language-generation model. Upon generating draft language, the author reviewed, edited, and revised the language to their own liking and takes ultimate responsibility for the content of this publication.
“Recently, a team of researchers from Oxford and Brussels has developed a theory of causality in quantum theory, in which causal concepts are defined in intrinsically quantum terms rather than pertaining to an emergent classical level of measurement outcomes. This has offered, in particular, a causal understanding of the correlations produced by entangled states. Now, they have generalized the theory to allow causal influence to go in cycles, providing a causal understanding of processes with events in indefinite causal order.”
* * *
Consciousness is in constant flux. Consciousness is essentially electric in context, as are the symbols used to identify its many states of awareness. Awareness is magnetic in context drawing towards it virtual substance and complementary energies of like kind.
Consciousness and awareness are designed of the same cloth (DNA) making quantum, holographic and fractal impressions upon humanity's contextual awareness. Design describes the interplay between different "states of energy in motion" in an unending search for universal balance and equilibrium.
Please review the life work of Dr. Hans Jenny (1904-1972) as evidence of how energy is transmitted. Observe the forms that symbolically emerge as the result of energy in resonance.
Born and raised in Chicago, Ill. I received my BFA and MFA from the University of Illinois, Urbana. Professor Emeritus Columbus College of Art and Design. I have taught, lectured and written about
design and the design process throughout my tenure as Dean of Industrial and Interior Design. My interests lie in demonstrating design as fundamental to consciousness, archetypal in context and the underlying language of change and transformation.
https://www.idsa.org/profile/carl-garant/
